Hitos de la Evaluación Perceptual Auditiva de la Voz: ¿Hay Evidencia?

Milestones of the Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality is There Evidence?

Contenido principal del artículo

Luisa Fernanda Angel Gordillo

Resumen

La evaluación perceptual auditiva es la herramienta más antigua y con mayor uso para determinar la idoneidad de la voz humana. Como resultado de una revisión minuciosa en PubMed se identifica que este enfoque ha evolucionado en lo conceptual y lo metodológico enmarcado en tres momentos: el primero caracterizado por el uso indiscriminado de etiquetas particulares, el segundo centrado en la construcción y refinamiento de escalas con confiabilidad intra e interevaluador, y a futuro, su posicionamiento como un estándar de oro que exalta los determinantes humanos y sociales de la voz. Las escalas más utilizadas en las investigaciones fueron GRBAS y CAPE-V. Adicionalmente, se argumenta la idoneidad de los vocablos más apropiados en idioma español  para la denominación de “voice quality” equiparable a cualidad vocal (indicador descriptivo multidimensional) o calidad vocal (valoración de severidad) según corresponda.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Biografía del autor/a (VER)

Luisa Fernanda Angel Gordillo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Maestría/Magister UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA SEDE BOGOTA
Maestria en discapacidad e inclusion social 

Referencias (VER)

Acero, G., Cuervo, C., Florez, R. La voz un cambio de imagen. Documento de trabajo. Grupo Comunicando 90; 1991

American National Standards Institute. American National Standard bioacoustical terminology (ANSI S3.20-2015). New York, NY: Author. Disponible en: https://asastandards.org/Terms/timbre/ Página web de ASA - Acoustical Society of America [acceso 24 Jun 2016; actualizada 24 Jun 2016

]Austin, G. Chironomia, or a Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery. London: 1806. Ed. Mary Margaret Robb and Lester Thonssen. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1966.

Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Jun; 42(3):183-8.

Bassich C J, Ludlow CL. The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. J Speech Hear Disord 1986; 51:125-33.

Blaustein S, Asher B. Reliability of perceptual voice assessment. J Commun Disord 1983;16:157—61.

Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Res. 1969 Jun;12(2):246-69

De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 1997 Mar; 11(1):74-80.

Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., Cornut, G., Crevier- Buchman, L., Friedrich, G., Woisard, V. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques: Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb; 258(2):77-82.

Diehl, C.F.; McDonald, E.T. Effect Of Voice Quality On Communication. J Speech Hear Disord. 1956 Jun;21(2):233-7

Ferrand, C.T. Voice disorders scope of the theory and practice. The Allyn & Bacon communication sciences and disorders series. Pearson Education Inc. USA; 2012; p. 129-134.

Ferrer CA, Haderlein T, Maryn Y, de Bodt MS, Nöth E. Collinearity and Sample Coverage Issues in the Objective Measurement of Vocal Quality: The Case of Roughness and Breathiness . J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jan 22; 61(1):1-24.

Gelfer MP. Perceptual attributes of voice: development and use of rating scales. J Voice. 1988 Dec; 2(4): 320–326

Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Wedin L. Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngol. 1980 Nov-Dec; 90(5-6):441-51.

Hillman, R. SIGnatures: The Quest for Voice Assessment Guidelines. The ASHA Leader, March 2013, Vol. 18 (SIG N), 54-55. Disponible en: https://leader.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=1784846 Página web de ASHA - American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. [acceso 20 Feb 2018; actualizada 31 May 2018]

Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981:81-4.Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36:21-40.

Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15.Kreiman J, Gerratt B. Perceptual assessment of voice quality: Past, present, and future. En: Ma EPM & Yiu EML. Handbook of voice assessments. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2011 p. 291 - 304

Kreiman, J.; Gerratt, BR: Perceptual Assessment of Voice Quality: Past, Present, and Future. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, July 2010, Vol. 20:62-67.

Kreul EJ, Hecker MH. Descriptions of the speech of patients with cancer of the vocal folds. II. Judgments of age and voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1283+.

Lively MA, Emanuel FW. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for normal and simulated rough vowels produced by adult females. J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Sep; 13(3):503-17.

Moore, W. E. Personality traits and voice quality deficiencies. J Speech Disord 1939; Vol. 4: 33-36. 73AretéISSN-L: 1657-2513 ART 18 (2) pág. 65 -74Gordillo

Con el acompañamiento de:ccfonoaudiologos@ccfonoaudiologos.co(1) 4577185

Perkins, W. H. Vocal function: Assessment and therapy. In L E. Travis (Ed.), Handbook of speech pathology and audiology (pp. 481-503): New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Real Academia Española. Diccionario de la lengua española. Edición del tricentenario. Disponible en: http://dle.rae.es/?id=BRNxtDx Página web de la Real Academia Española [acceso 16 Oct 2016; actualizada 31 May 2018]

Sherman D. and Linke E. The Influence Of Certain Vowel Types On Degree Of Harsh Voice Quality. J Speech Hear Disord. 1952 Sep;17(4):401-8.

Sherman D. The Merits Of Backward Playing Of Connected Speech In The Scaling of Voice Quality Disorders. J Speech Hear Disord. 1954 Sep;19(3):312-21.

Shipp T, Huntington DA. Some acoustic and perceptual factors in acute-laryngitic hoarseness. J Speech Hear Disord. 1965 Nov; 30(4):350-9.

Steiner, R J. International dictionary. English / Spanish Spanish/English. Second edition. Simon & Schuster ́s, Inc. Webster’s New World; USA; 1997; p. 604.

Yamauchi, E. J., Imaizumi, S., Maruyama, H., & Haji, T. Perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: A comparative analysis between the RASATI and GRBASI scales. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2010 Oct; 35(3):121-8

Citado por