Milestones of the Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality is There Evidence?
Hitos de la Evaluación Perceptual Auditiva de la Voz: ¿Hay Evidencia?
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
The articles must be original, must not have been published or submitted to other journals.
Once submitted to the magazine Areté. Authors should indicate in their first article.
In the letter of originality is written: Fulfilling the requirements demanded by your Journal, I send to you the article entitled: XXXXX so that its publication is considered, indicating the following:
1. It is an original article, with research topics in XXX, that complies with the rules for the publication of articles that are detailed in your journal.
2. It is an unpublished article, which has not been sent for review and is not published, partially or totally, in any other scientific journal, national or foreign.
3. There are no conflicts of interest with state or private organizations that may affect the content, results or conclusions of this publication.
4. The article has been read and approved by each of the authors, and therefore the data and references to already published materials are duly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographic notes and in the citations that stand out as such.
5. In the event of publication, I give free of charge all the author's economic rights deriving from the article in question, understanding the transfer of the following rights: reproduction in all its modalities, transformation or adaptation, public communication, distribution and, in general , any type of exploitation that can be carried out by any means known or known.
Main Article Content
The auditory perceptual evaluation is the oldest and
most used tool to determine the suitability of the human
voice. As a result of a thorough review in PubMed it
is identified that this approach has evolved in the
conceptual and the methodological framed in three
moments: the first characterized by the indiscriminate
use of particular labels, the second focused on the
construction and refinement of scales with intra- and
inter-evaluator reliability, and in future, its positioning
as a gold standard that exalts the human and social
determinants of the voice. The scales most used in
the reports were GRBAS and CAPE-V. Additionally, the
suitability of the most suitable words in Spanish language
is argued for the denomination of “voice quality”
comparable to “cualidad vocal” (multidimensional
descriptive indicator) or “calidad vocal” (severity
estimate) as appropriate
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
- Publisher
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
Acero, G., Cuervo, C., Florez, R. La voz un cambio de imagen. Documento de trabajo. Grupo Comunicando 90; 1991
American National Standards Institute. American National Standard bioacoustical terminology (ANSI S3.20-2015). New York, NY: Author. Disponible en: https://asastandards.org/Terms/timbre/ Página web de ASA - Acoustical Society of America [acceso 24 Jun 2016; actualizada 24 Jun 2016
]Austin, G. Chironomia, or a Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery. London: 1806. Ed. Mary Margaret Robb and Lester Thonssen. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1966.
Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Jun; 42(3):183-8.
Bassich C J, Ludlow CL. The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. J Speech Hear Disord 1986; 51:125-33.
Blaustein S, Asher B. Reliability of perceptual voice assessment. J Commun Disord 1983;16:157—61.
Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Res. 1969 Jun;12(2):246-69
De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 1997 Mar; 11(1):74-80.
Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., Cornut, G., Crevier- Buchman, L., Friedrich, G., Woisard, V. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques: Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb; 258(2):77-82.
Diehl, C.F.; McDonald, E.T. Effect Of Voice Quality On Communication. J Speech Hear Disord. 1956 Jun;21(2):233-7
Ferrand, C.T. Voice disorders scope of the theory and practice. The Allyn & Bacon communication sciences and disorders series. Pearson Education Inc. USA; 2012; p. 129-134.
Ferrer CA, Haderlein T, Maryn Y, de Bodt MS, Nöth E. Collinearity and Sample Coverage Issues in the Objective Measurement of Vocal Quality: The Case of Roughness and Breathiness . J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jan 22; 61(1):1-24.
Gelfer MP. Perceptual attributes of voice: development and use of rating scales. J Voice. 1988 Dec; 2(4): 320–326
Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Wedin L. Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngol. 1980 Nov-Dec; 90(5-6):441-51.
Hillman, R. SIGnatures: The Quest for Voice Assessment Guidelines. The ASHA Leader, March 2013, Vol. 18 (SIG N), 54-55. Disponible en: https://leader.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=1784846 Página web de ASHA - American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. [acceso 20 Feb 2018; actualizada 31 May 2018]
Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981:81-4.Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36:21-40.
Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15.Kreiman J, Gerratt B. Perceptual assessment of voice quality: Past, present, and future. En: Ma EPM & Yiu EML. Handbook of voice assessments. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2011 p. 291 - 304
Kreiman, J.; Gerratt, BR: Perceptual Assessment of Voice Quality: Past, Present, and Future. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, July 2010, Vol. 20:62-67.
Kreul EJ, Hecker MH. Descriptions of the speech of patients with cancer of the vocal folds. II. Judgments of age and voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1283+.
Lively MA, Emanuel FW. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for normal and simulated rough vowels produced by adult females. J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Sep; 13(3):503-17.
Moore, W. E. Personality traits and voice quality deficiencies. J Speech Disord 1939; Vol. 4: 33-36. 73AretéISSN-L: 1657-2513 ART 18 (2) pág. 65 -74Gordillo
Con el acompañamiento de:ccfonoaudiologos@ccfonoaudiologos.co(1) 4577185
Perkins, W. H. Vocal function: Assessment and therapy. In L E. Travis (Ed.), Handbook of speech pathology and audiology (pp. 481-503): New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Real Academia Española. Diccionario de la lengua española. Edición del tricentenario. Disponible en: http://dle.rae.es/?id=BRNxtDx Página web de la Real Academia Española [acceso 16 Oct 2016; actualizada 31 May 2018]
Sherman D. and Linke E. The Influence Of Certain Vowel Types On Degree Of Harsh Voice Quality. J Speech Hear Disord. 1952 Sep;17(4):401-8.
Sherman D. The Merits Of Backward Playing Of Connected Speech In The Scaling of Voice Quality Disorders. J Speech Hear Disord. 1954 Sep;19(3):312-21.
Shipp T, Huntington DA. Some acoustic and perceptual factors in acute-laryngitic hoarseness. J Speech Hear Disord. 1965 Nov; 30(4):350-9.
Steiner, R J. International dictionary. English / Spanish Spanish/English. Second edition. Simon & Schuster ́s, Inc. Webster’s New World; USA; 1997; p. 604.
Yamauchi, E. J., Imaizumi, S., Maruyama, H., & Haji, T. Perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: A comparative analysis between the RASATI and GRBASI scales. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2010 Oct; 35(3):121-8
Citations
