Relation of the Audioperceptual Examination of the Voice with Organic Lesions
Relación del Examen Audioperceptual de la Voz con Lesiones Orgánicas de cuerdas vocales
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
The articles must be original, must not have been published or submitted to other journals.
Once submitted to the magazine Areté. Authors should indicate in their first article.
In the letter of originality is written: Fulfilling the requirements demanded by your Journal, I send to you the article entitled: XXXXX so that its publication is considered, indicating the following:
1. It is an original article, with research topics in XXX, that complies with the rules for the publication of articles that are detailed in your journal.
2. It is an unpublished article, which has not been sent for review and is not published, partially or totally, in any other scientific journal, national or foreign.
3. There are no conflicts of interest with state or private organizations that may affect the content, results or conclusions of this publication.
4. The article has been read and approved by each of the authors, and therefore the data and references to already published materials are duly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographic notes and in the citations that stand out as such.
5. In the event of publication, I give free of charge all the author's economic rights deriving from the article in question, understanding the transfer of the following rights: reproduction in all its modalities, transformation or adaptation, public communication, distribution and, in general , any type of exploitation that can be carried out by any means known or known.
Main Article Content
The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship of the audio-perceptual evaluation of the voice with the diagnosis of organic laryngeal disorders,
specifically associated with the “grade” (G), “roughness” (R), and “breathiness” (B) parameters of the GRBAS scale classified into “moderate” (2) and “severe” (3). Overall,
264 patients were assessed. The main complaint was dysphonia. A speech therapist and a laryngologist at the Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, between April 2013 and April 2014,
evaluated the patients. At first examination, the audio-perceptual evaluation was performed on anamnesis, followed by laryngeal videostroboscopy, and computerized acoustic
analysis; a rough voice was associated with the presence of subharmonics and breathiness with interharmonic noise or with the disappearance of harmonics. Patients with instability
and/or tremor, and children under 14 years of age were excluded. Results: of all patients scored G3 (grade), 86 (44.56%) had organic disorders vs 1 (1.41%) with a functional disorder.
Of the patients graded as G2, 94 (48.70%) had organic disorders vs 19 (26.76%) with a functional disorder. The majority of patients who were graded as two or three according to the
parameters G, R, and B presented with an organic disorder.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
- Publisher
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
Aronson A. E. (1990). Thieme Inc., Clinical Voice Disorders: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Third Edition. New York.
Behrman, A. (2005). Common Practices of Voice Therapists in the Evaluation of Patients. Journal of Voice, 19(3): 454-469.
Bele, I.V. (2005). Reability in perceptual analysis of voice quality. Journal of Voice, 19(4):555-73.
Bhuta, T., Patrick, L., Garnett, J. (2004). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. Journal of Voice, 18:299-304.
Bunton, K., Kent, R., Duffy, J., Rosenbeck J., Kent J. (2007). Listener Agreement for Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language and
Hearing Research,50: 1481-1495
Campos, G. (2012). Avances tecnológicos recientes en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las enfermedades de la laringe y el tracto aerodigestivo superior. Revista Medicina,
(2): 65-81
Carding P., Carlson E., Epstein R., Mathieson L., and Shewell C. (2000). Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom.Logopedics and Phoniatrics Vocology,
(3): 133-138.
Cobeta I., Nuñez F., Fernández S. (2013, octubre). Patología de la Voz. Ponencia oficial. Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial Ed. Marge.
Cohen, S., Dinan M., Roy, N. et al. (2014). Diagnosis Change in Voice-Disordered Patients Evaluated by Primary Care and/or Otolaryngology: A Longitudinal Study. Otolaryngology.
Head and Neck Surgery, 150(1) 95–102.
Cortés Gama, A., Marques Santos, L., Aparecida Sanches, N., Guimarães Côrtes M., Barreto Bassi, I. (2011). Estudo do efeito do apoio visual do traçado espectrográfico na confiabilidade
da análise perceptivo auditiva. Revista CEFAC,13(2):314-321
De Bodt, F., Wuyts, F., Van De Heyning P., Croux, C. (1997). Test-retest study on the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of vocal
quality.
Journal of Voice, 11:74-80.
Dejonckere, P. (2000). Perceptual and laboratory assessment of dysphonia. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 33:731–750
Dejonckere, P. (2010). Chapter Voice Evaluation and Respiratory Function Assessment. in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Part of the series European Manual of Medicine Anniko M,
Bernal –Sprekelsen M, Bonkowsky M, Bradley P, Iurato S. (eds). pp 563-574.
Dejonckere PH, Bradley P et al. (2001). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating
new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 258(2):77-82.
Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B, (1996).“Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations
with acoustic measurements.” Revue de laryngology, otology, rhinologie, 117(3):219–24.
Estella, P., Edwin, M. (2006). Multiparametric Evaluation of Dysphonic Severity. Journal of Voice, 20 (3): 380-390.
García-Tapia, R., Cobeta, I. (1996). Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de la voz. Madrid: Garsi.
Gurlekian J. (1997). El laboratorio de audición y habla del LIS [Speech and auditory laboratory from LIS]. En M. Guirao (Ed.), Procesos sensoriales y cognitivos (pp. 55-81).
Buenos Aires: Dunken.
Hakkesteegt, M., Brocaar, M. et al. (2008). The Relationship Between Perceptual Evaluationand Objective Multiparametric Evaluation of Dysphonia Severity. Journal of Voice, 22 (2): 138-145.
Hammamberg, B. (2000). Voice Research and clinical leeds. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52: 93-102
Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical Examination of the voice. New York: U.S.A. Springer Verlag.
Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., Ito, M. (2007). When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122:2354-64.
Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., Kempster, G., Erman, A., Berke, G. (1993). Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality - Review, Tutorial, and a Framework for Future-Research. Journal of speech and hearing
research,36(1):21-40.
Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., Precoda, K. (1990). Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of speech and hearing research,33: 103-115.
Kreiman, J., Vanlancker-Siditis, D., Gerrat, B. (2004). Defining and Measuring Voice Quality. En Sound to Sense: June 11 – June 13. MIT
Martens, J., Versnel, H., Dejonckere, P. (2007). The Effect of Visible Speech in the Perceptual Rating of Pathological Voices.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg;133(2):178-185.
Nawka, T., Anders, L.C., Wendler, J. (1994) Die auditive Beurteilung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-system. Sprache—Stimme—Gehör; 18:130–133.
Nemr, K., Amar A., A., Abrahão, M., Leite, Köhle J., Santos, A.O., Correa L.A.C. (2005). Análise comparativa entre avaliação fonoaudiológica perceptivo auditiva, análise acústica e
laringoscopias indiretas para avaliação vocal em população com queixa vocal. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 71(1):13-17
Núñez Batalla, F., Díaz Molina, J., et al. (2012). El espectrograma de banda estrecha como ayuda para el aprendizaje del método GRABS de análisis perceptual de la disfonía.
Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 63(3):173-179.
Núñez Batalla F., Fernández S. Afecciones benignas de las cuerdas vocales: lesiones exudativas del espacio de Reinke y otras lesiones (2013). En Cobeta I., Nuñez F., Fernández S. (comp.)
Patología de la Voz. Ponencia oficial. Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial (pp 242- 257). Ed. Marge.
Núñez Batalla F., Suárez Nieto C. (1998) Manual de Evaluación y Diagnóstico de la Voz.Universidad de Oviedo.
Oates, J. (2009). Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered vocal quality –pros, cons and future directions. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61 (1): 49-56.
Omori, K., Kojima, H., Kakani, R., Slavit, D., Blaugrund, S. (1997). Acoustic Characteristics of Rough Voice Subharmonics. Journal of Voice, 11 (1):40-47
Patel S, Shrivastav R. (2007). Perception of dysphonic vocal quality: some thoughts and research updates - perspectives on voice and voice disorders. ASHA Division 3.17(2):3-6.
Pinho, S., Pontes, P. (2002). Escala de avaliação perceptiva da fonte glótica: RASAT. Vox Brasilis, 3 (1):11-3.
Pontes, P., Vieira, V., Gonçalves, M., Pontes A. (2002). Características das vozes roucas, ásperas e normais: análise acústica espectrográfica comparativa. Revista Brasileira de
Otorrinolaringología, 68 (2): 182-8.
Saavedra-Mendoza AGM, Akaki-Caballero M. (2014). Guía de práctica clínica de disfonía basada en evidencia. Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana 59:195-208.
Sáenz –Lechón, N., Godino-Llorente, J., et al (2006). Automatic Assessment of Voice Quality According to the GRBAS Scale. Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference.
New York City, USA. (Aug 30-Sept 3)
Shah, R., Altman, K., Woo P. (2013. Enero). Discrepancies in Laryngeal Diagnoses between Otolaryngologists: A Descriptive Review, Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting.
Scottsdale, Arizona. USA.
Silva, R., Simoes Zenari, M., Nemr N. (2012). Impact of auditory training for perceptual assessment of voice executed by undergraduate students in Speech-Language Pathology.
Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiología.24 (1):19-25
Speyer, R., Wieneke, G., Dejonckere, P. (2004). Documentation of progress in voice therapy: perceptual, acoustic, and laryngostroboscopic findings pretherapy and posttherapy.
Journal of Voice.18:325-340.
Webb, A., Carding, P., et al (2004). The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 261: 429–434
Wendler J., Rauhut A., and Krüger H. (1986) Classification of voice qualities. Journal of Phonetics. 14: 483-488.
Yanagihara, N. (1967). Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research; 10:531-41
Titze, I. (1994) .Workshop on acoustic voice analysis; Summary Statement.National Center for Voice and Speech, Denver, Colorado,USA
Citations
