Meta cognition in the reading process
La meta cognición en el proceso de lectura
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
The articles must be original, must not have been published or submitted to other journals.
Once submitted to the magazine Areté. Authors should indicate in their first article.
In the letter of originality is written: Fulfilling the requirements demanded by your Journal, I send to you the article entitled: XXXXX so that its publication is considered, indicating the following:
1. It is an original article, with research topics in XXX, that complies with the rules for the publication of articles that are detailed in your journal.
2. It is an unpublished article, which has not been sent for review and is not published, partially or totally, in any other scientific journal, national or foreign.
3. There are no conflicts of interest with state or private organizations that may affect the content, results or conclusions of this publication.
4. The article has been read and approved by each of the authors, and therefore the data and references to already published materials are duly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographic notes and in the citations that stand out as such.
5. In the event of publication, I give free of charge all the author's economic rights deriving from the article in question, understanding the transfer of the following rights: reproduction in all its modalities, transformation or adaptation, public communication, distribution and, in general , any type of exploitation that can be carried out by any means known or known.
Main Article Content
The following article aims to expose a historical journey to the concept of metacognition and metacognitive variables in order to establish the relationship with the reading process; specifying some metacognitive strategies that may be used to encourage reading comprehension, understood as the reconstruction of meaning that allows the conceptualization and therefore the learning in different subject areas and fields of life.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
- Publisher
- Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Article Details
Adams, M.J., & Collins, A. (1985). A schema theoretic view of reading. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretial models and processes of reading. Newark: Del. IRA.
Allende, F.; Condemarin, M. (1986). La lectura: Teoría, evaluación y desarrollo. Santiago; Andrés Bello.
Antonijevic, N. & Chadwick, C. (1981/82). Estrategias cognitivas y metacognición. Revista de Tecnología Educativa, 7, 307-321.
Antonini, M. & Pino, J. (1991). Modelos del proceso de lectura: descripción, evaluación e implicaciones pedagógicas. En A. Puente (Eds.), Comprensión de la lectura y acción docente. Madrid: Pirámide.
Baker L, Brown A. Metacognitive and the reading process. En D. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research. 1981. New York:Plenum
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3- 38.
Baker, L. (1991) Metacognition, reading and science education. En C. M. Santa, D. Alvermann (Eds.) Science learning: Processes and applications, International Reading Association:
Newsdale, Delaware-EE.UU.
Borkowski, J.G. & Turner, L.A. (1990). Transsituational characteristics of metacognition.In W. Schneider & F.E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies andknowledge in cognitive performance. N.Y.:
Springer - Verlag.Bormuth, J. R., Carr, J., Manning, J., And Pearson,D., 1970, Children’s Comprehension of Between and Within Sentence Syntactic Structures. Journal of Educational Psychology
, pp. 349-357.
Brown, A. (1987). “Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanism” en Franz Weiner et al.(Eds) Metacognition, Motivation Understanding
Broadway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P.H. Musen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III (pp.77-166). New York: Wiley.
Burón, J. (1993). Enseñar a aprender: Introducción a la metacognición. Bilbao: Mensajero.Pág. 10
Cabrera, F; Donoso, T. (1994). El proceso lector y su evaluación. Editorial Alertes Pedagogía.
Carrasco, José Bernardo. (1997). Hacia una enseñanza eficaz. Ediciones Rialp S.A. Madrid.
Carriedo, N. Y Alonso Tapia, J. (1994). ¿Cómo enseñar a comprender un texto? Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Cázarez González, Fidel G. (1.999). Integración de los procesos cognitivos para el desarrollo de la inteligencia. Editorial Trillas.
Cuervo, C. (1999). La profesión de Fonoaudiología. Colombia en perspectiva internacional. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Pág. 28
Cuetos Vega, F, Psicología de la lectura. (2006). Ed. Praxis
Denyer, M. (1998). La lectura: una destreza pragmática y cognitivamente activa. Madrid: Universidad Antonio de Nebrija. Col. Aula de español.
Diaz, C. Jacquelinne. Un enfoque fonoaudiológico del lenguaje escrito. En imprenta. Universidad Manuela Beltrán. 2009.
Díaz, Frida, Hernández, Gerardo. (1998). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Una interpretación constructivista. Mc Graw Hill.
Diaz, J., Landazuri, E. & Romero, E. (2010) “Leer es la llave, comprender es la clave. Una propuesta cognitiva para estudiantes de Fonoaudiología”. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Dorado, C. (1996). Aprender a Aprender [Consultadoel 16/01/09] en http://www.xtec.net/~cdorado/cdora1/esp/metaco.htmFlavell (1979) “Metacognition and CognitiveMonitoring. A New Area of cognitiveDevelopmental
Inquiry” en American Psychologist.October (pp.705-712).Flavell J. Cognitive monitoring. En W.P. Dickson(Ed.), Children’s oral communicationskills. 1981.New York: Academic.
Flavell, J. H. (1970). Developmental studies ofmediated memory. En H.W. Reese & L.P.Lipsitt (Eds), Advances in child developmentand behaviour, Vol. 5 (pp. 181 – 211).Nueva York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First’s disscusants comments.What is memory development thedevolopment of Human Development. 14,272-278.
Flavell, J.H. & Wellman, H.M. (1977). Metamemory.In R.V. Kail & J.W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectiveson the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Hillsdale: Lea.
Garrod, S., O’brien, E. J. Morris, R. K. Y Rayner,(1990). Elaborative inferencing and active or passive process. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Learning, Memory and Cognition,
(2), 250-257.
Gombert, J.R. (1990). Le developpement metalingnistique, París: P.U.F.
Goodman, K. (1996). “La lectura, la escritura y los textos escritos: una perspectiva transaccional sociopsicolingüística”, en: Textos en contexto 2: Los procesos de la lectura y la
escritura. Buenos Aires: Lectura y vida.
Graesser, A.C., Haberlandt, Y Koizumi, D. (1987). How is reading time influenced by knowledge-based inferences and world knowledge? En B.K. Britton y S.M. Glynn (eds), Executive control processes in reading.
HilIsdale, NJ., Erlbaum.
Hilbert D., Bernays P. [1934, 1939] Grundlagen der Mathematik. Vol. I, 1934, 471 pp. Vol. II, 1939, 498 pp., Berlin (Springer) (Russian translation available)
Jiménez Rodríguez, Virginia (2004). Metacognición y comprensión de la lectura: evaluación de los componentes estratégicos (procesos y variables) mediante la elaboración de una escala de conciencia lectora (ESCOLA).
Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología. Madrid.
Johnston, P. (1989) La evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Un enfoque cognitivo. Madrid: Visor.
López, G. “La metacomprensión y la lectura”, en: Martínez, M. C. Los procesos de la lectura y la escritura. Cali: Universidad del Valle, 1997
Lunzer, E. & Dolan, T. (1979). Reading for learningin the Secondary School. In C. Ashes (Eds.), Language, reading and learning.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Markman E. Realizing that you don’t understand.Child Development. 1977; 48: 986-92
Mateos. M.M. (2001). Metacognición y educación.Buenos Aires: Aique. Pág. 48.
Mayor, J., Suengas, A. Y González, J. (1993). Estrategias metacognitivas: Aprender a aprender y aprender a pensar. Madrid: Síntesis. Mechanisms. In Weinert, F., and Kluwe, R. (eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and
Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.65–116.
Miller Ph. Preschooler’s knowledge about attention.Developmental Psychology. 1982;18:871-75
Morales, A. “Entrenamiento en el uso de estrategias para comprender la lectura”. En: Lectura y vida. Año7, No. 2 (junio 1986); p.15 - 20.
Nelson, T.O. y Narens, L. 1990. Metamemory: A Theoretical framework and new findings. En G. Bower (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academy Press. Nelson, T.O. 1994. Why investigate
metacognition? En J. Metcalfe y A.P. Shimamura (eds) Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Otero, J.C.; Campanario, J.M. (1990) Comprehension evaluation and regulation in learning from science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 447-460.
Puentes, A. (1994). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza. Madrid: CEPE. Pág. 115.
Puentes, A. (2000). Evaluación de la metacognición y comprensión de lectura. Fundación de Neuropsicología Clínica.
Ríos, P. Metacognición y comprensión de la lectura.1991. En A. Puente (Comp.), Comprensión de la lectura y acción docente.Madrid: Pirámide.
Shimamura, A.P. (2000). What is metacognition? The brain knows. American Journal of Psychology, 113 (1), 142-146.
Tardif, J. “La evaluación del saber – leer: Un asunto más de competencia que de actuación”, en: Rodriguez, E. y Larger, E. La lectura. Santiago de Cali: Universidad del Valle, 1997. Pág. 181.
Watzlawick, Paul; Veabin, Janet H Y Jackson, Don D.; Teoría de la Comunicación Humana:interacciones, patologías y paradojas.Editorial Tiempo Contemporáneo. BuenosAires. 1967. Pág 17.
Wellman, H. M., Fabricius, W. V. & Sophian, C.(1985). The early development of planning. En H. M. Wellman (Comp.), Children´s searching (pp. 123-149). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wellman, H.M. (1985). The origins of metacognition.In D.L. Forrest-Pressley, G.E. Mackinson & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performances. Vol. 1. N.Y.: Academic Press.
Yussen, S. (1985). The Rol of metacognition in Contemporary Theories of Cognitive Development. En D.L. Forrest – Presley, G.E. Mackinson, y T.G. Waller (Eds). Metacognition,Cognition and Human Performance.
Tjeoretical Perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 253 – 283.
Zimmerman, B.J. & Martínez - Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 283 - 290.
